United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Barrington A. Hamilton, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding frisk to be valid where the officers observed an “unusual bulge” in defendant’s pocket
• patdown was justified after officer observed unidentifiable bulge in defendant's pants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).