· 8/12/2003
United States of America, Appellant/cross v. Donald Michael Hutman, Cross Appellant/appellee
Citations
- 339 F.3d 773
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16513
- 2003 WL 21910742
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing one panel of the circuit may not overrule another absent a change in the law
- holding \a downward departure . . . may be appropriate for a relatively young defendant with a brief criminal career\
- concluding after a survey of precedent that “a downward departure from career offender status may be appropriate for a relatively young defendant with a brief criminal career”
- discussing the availability of downward departures for defendants whose sentencing ranges reflect an overstated criminal history due to the career offender enhancement
- internal quotation marks and indications of alterations from original omitted
- applying the PROTECT Act to a pending appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Heaney, Bye
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.