Skip to main content
· 8/12/2003

United States of America, Appellant/cross v. Donald Michael Hutman, Cross Appellant/appellee

Citations

  • 339 F.3d 773
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16513
  • 2003 WL 21910742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing one panel of the circuit may not overrule another absent a change in the law
  • holding \a downward departure . . . may be appropriate for a relatively young defendant with a brief criminal career\
  • concluding after a survey of precedent that “a downward departure from career offender status may be appropriate for a relatively young defendant with a brief criminal career”
  • discussing the availability of downward departures for defendants whose sentencing ranges reflect an overstated criminal history due to the career offender enhancement
  • internal quotation marks and indications of alterations from original omitted
  • applying the PROTECT Act to a pending appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Heaney, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.