Skip to main content
· 3/1/1993

United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Quentin Yankton, Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 986 F.2d 1225
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3216
  • 1993 WL 49682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statement to tribal officers that \I did not rape . . . my niece\ was a general denial which would not support an obstruction enhancement
  • \The legal question of whether the district court had the authority to depart upward in the exercise of its discretion . . . is reviewed by this court de novo.\
  • categorizing physical trauma resulting from rape as serious bodily injury
  • issues involving interpretation of scope of Guidelines reviewed de novo
  • categorizing physical trauma resulting from rape as serious bodily injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Magill, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.