Skip to main content
· 11/18/1996

United States of America, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Lauree Flaa Brekke James Stanley Brekke, Appellees/cross-Appellants

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criminal proceeding was different from previous civil forfeiture action for res judicata purposes
  • holding that a post-amendment FCA case was compensatory and not punitive
  • applying de novo review to district court's construction of a contract
  • applying de novo review to district court's construction of a contract
  • “A multiple recovery of this type is compensatory rather than punitive, even though it contains a penalty element____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Lay, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.