United States of America, and v. Roger J. Hourihan, and Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a sentencing court’s 8 “decision to sentence based on its view of the evidence rather than the jury’s is reversible error”
• also rejecting claim that a New York certificate of relief from disabilities rendered the defendant’s prior conviction inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 609

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).