United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in some cases the court’s inquiry may be limited to the defendant’s statements on the financial affidavit
• requiring counsel to continue representation after retainer ran out did not violate Thirteenth Amendment
• “The task necessarily varies with the circumstances presented, and no one method or combination of methods is required.” (internal quotation omitted)
• reviewing district court’s mid-case appointment of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).