United States of America, and Mary Laura Brookins v. South Bend Community School Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that filing the motion 7 four and a half months from the point of knowledge was untimely
• noting that \Rule 24 is silent as to what constitutes a timely application and the question must therefore be answered in each case by the exercise of the sound discretion of the court\
• stating that prospective intervenor generally must move promptly for intervention as soon as he \knows or has reason to know that his interests might be adversely affected by the outcome of the litigation\
• stating that prospective intervenor generally must move promptly for intervention as soon as he “knows or has reason to know that his interests might be adversely affected by the outcome of the litigation”
• stating that prospec- tive intervenor generally must move promptly for intervention as soon as he \knows or has reason to know that his interests might be adversely affected by the outcome of the litigation\
• noting that \Rule 24 is silent as to what constitutes a timely application and the question must therefore be answered in each case by the exercise of the sound dis- cretion of the court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).