Skip to main content
· 2/8/1974

United States of America and Carl Rosen, Revenue Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Alvin I. Malnik

Citations

  • 489 F.2d 682
  • 33 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 692
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to sustain Fifth Amendment objection in absence of specific questions is unacceptable
  • trial judge “must inquire whether there are questions which can be answered without forcing the witness to invoke the privilege”
  • a subject of a subpoena should appear before the interrogating officer and under oath specifically claim his constitutional rights as to particular questions while answering others not presenting a threat of self-incrimination
  • “A ‘blanket’ refusal to answer all questions is unacceptable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingraham, Wisdom, Dyer, Ingra-Ham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.