· 7/5/1985
United States of America, Acting Through the Small Business Administration v. C.E. Light, A/K/A Charles E. Light, Jr.
Citations
- 766 F.2d 394
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where a party fails to carry his burden under Rule 56( [d]), postponement of a ruling on a motion for summary judgment is unjustified.”
- “Under the parol evidence rule, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary, contradict, or add to a written contract which is unambiguous . . . .”
- the party seeking additional discovery must affirmatively demonstrate how it will allow her “to rebut the movant’s showing of the absence of a genuine issue of fact”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross, Arnold, Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.