Skip to main content
· 7/5/1985

United States of America, Acting Through the Small Business Administration v. C.E. Light, A/K/A Charles E. Light, Jr.

Citations

  • 766 F.2d 394
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 20223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where a party fails to carry his burden under Rule 56( [d]), postponement of a ruling on a motion for summary judgment is unjustified.”
  • “Under the parol evidence rule, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary, contradict, or add to a written contract which is unambiguous . . . .”
  • the party seeking additional discovery must affirmatively demonstrate how it will allow her “to rebut the movant’s showing of the absence of a genuine issue of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross, Arnold, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.