United States of America (93-5156) v. Jeffrey Otis Peters (93-5153) and Marisha Lynn Winton (93-5154)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that merely being present when a search warrant is executed is not enough to convict a party of possession with intent to distribute and stating that reversal would have been less likely if the government had offered evidence of-prior drug transactions
• “Expert testimony indicated that amount of drugs, the currency denominations, and the presence of a pager were consistent with drug distribution.”
• “Expert testimony indicated that amount of drugs, the currency denominations, and the presence of a pager were con- sistent with drug distribution.”
• “[w]e are also mindful that circumstantial evidence alone is sufficient to sustain a conviction and such evidence need not remove every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).