· 6/6/1996
United States Lines, Inc. v. United States (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)
Citations
- 196 B.R. 670
- 36 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 689
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7856
- 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 256
- 1996 WL 306719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if a limitations period on claim objections under section 502(d) was intended by Congress, it easily could have included a reference to section 502(d) in section 546(a)
- “ ‘If such a limitations period on claim objections under section 502(d) .was intended by Congress, it easily could have included a reference to section 502(d) in section 546(a).’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cote
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.