Skip to main content
· 6/6/1996

United States Lines, Inc. v. United States (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.)

Citations

  • 196 B.R. 670
  • 36 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 689
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7856
  • 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 256
  • 1996 WL 306719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if a limitations period on claim objections under section 502(d) was intended by Congress, it easily could have included a reference to section 502(d) in section 546(a)
  • “ ‘If such a limitations period on claim objections under section 502(d) .was intended by Congress, it easily could have included a reference to section 502(d) in section 546(a).’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.