· 12/23/1981
United States Gypsum Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Schiavo Brothers, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
Citations
- 668 F.2d 172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a successor judge \is empowered to reconsider [the legal conclusions of an unavailable predecessor] to the same extent that his or her predecessor could have\
- concluding that the presence of an integration clause did not negate any implied covenants contained in the lease agreement
- concluding that the presence of an integration clause did not negate any implied covenants contained in the lease agreement
- concluding that a successor judge “is empowered to reconsider [the legal conclusions of an unavailable predecessor] to the same extent that his or her predecessor could have”
- concluding that a successor judge \is empowered to reconsider [the legal conclusions of an unavailable predecessor] to the same extent that his or her pre- decessor could have\
- concluding that a successor judge \is empowered to reconsider [the legal conclusions of an unavailable predecessor] to the same extent that his or her pre- decessor could have\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldisert, Higginbotham, Sloviter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.