United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co. (In Re National Gypsum Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “withdrawal must be granted if it can be established (1) that the proceeding involves a substantial and material question of both Title 11 and non-Bankruptcy Code federal law; (2
• stating “withdrawal must be granted if it can be established (1) that the proceeding involves a substantial and material question of both Title 11 and non-Bankruptcy Code federal law; (2
• “if U.S. Gypsum’s patent infringement claims raise an antitrust defense in response, then certainly — by implication at least — there is more than a de minimis effect on interstate commerce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).