United States Gypsum Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discretion was granted when the plan provided the admin- ABATIE v. ALTA HEALTH & LIFE INS. 9639 istrator had “complete control” over the administration of the Plan, and “the power to construe” the Plan and “determine all questions” that arise under it
• “When it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on the evidence, for a particular outcome, that outcome is not arbitrary or capricious.”
• “When it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on the evidence, for a particular outcome, that outcome is not arbitrary or capricious.”
• “[Because [the] [p]laintiff has not directly challenged the district court’s factual conclusions ... all factual controversies are deemed abandoned on appeal and the district court’s factual findings are hereby upheld.”
• “[B]ecause [the] [p]laintiff has not directly challenged the district court’s factual conclusions . . . all factual controversies are deemed abandoned on appeal and the district court’s factual findings are hereby upheld.”
• “[B]ecause the parties have asked us to resolve legal questions on appeal, any concessions or assumptions by the Defendants are of no consequence to our analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).