United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff must exhaust all available primary coverage before proceeding against excess carrier when that carrier’s policy contains an other insurance clause
• holding that plaintiff must exhaust all available primary coverage before proceeding against excess carrier when that carrier's policy contains an other insurance clause
• rejecting argument that individual releases must be pinpointed; noting difficulty of finding historical evidence of releases
• rejecting argument that individual releases must be pinpointed; noting difficulty of finding historical evidence of releases
• applying “continuous trigger” approach under which every policy in place during ongoing destructive process (beginning, in the case of asbestos, with exposure to or installation of asbestos) is triggered
• applying \continuous trigger\ approach under which every policy in place during ongoing destructive process (beginning, in the case of asbestos, with exposure to or installation of asbestos) is triggered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).