United States Golf Association v. St. Andrews Systems, Data-Max, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the courts struggled for years to define the limits of the broad I.N.S. language and the doctrine largely survived “in the context of factual situations very close to that of I.N.S.”
• labeling as “speculative” our supreme court’s reliance on the likelihood that protecting the DJIA from unauthorized use would encourage new index options, and declining to engage in such “speculative inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).