Skip to main content
· 5/6/1987

United States Fire Insurance v. Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc.

Citations

  • 355 S.E.2d 428
  • 257 Ga. 77
  • 1987 Ga. LEXIS 731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that language in subrogation clause was unambiguous in granting preference to insurer
  • when words in a contract are plain and obvious, they must be given their literal meaning
  • “The test is not what the insurer intended its words to mean, but what a reasonable person in the position of the insured would understand them to mean.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.