Skip to main content
· 6/29/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 182 F.3d 201
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate jurisdiction “does not extend to orders . . . interpret[ing] or clarify[ing] injunctions.”
  • attributing the district court’s use of the term “MODIFIED” in its order following a motion to clarify to a “mistake in draftsmanship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.