United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding court of appeals was authorized to remand in the interest of justice and refusing writ of error
• holding court of appeals was authorized to remand in the interest of justice and refusing writ of error
• holding court of appeals was authorized to remand in the interest of justice and refusing writ of error
• holding remand is appropriate when a case, for any reason, has not been fully developed
• explaining that, where a case has not been fully developed or “in the interest of justice[,]” an appellate court may remand for a new trial rather than render judgment
• noting appellate court may remand when case has not been fully developed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).