United States Fidelity & Guaranty Corp. v. Advance Roofing & Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing Kepner as “[t]he leading 1 Arizona decision relating to an insurer’s duty to defend”
• affirming summary judgment on duty to investigate when insured \did not come forward and appropriately demonstrate that the [underlying plaintiff] was seeking damages within the coverage of\ the insured's policy
• all holding that faulty or defective workmanship is not an accident and therefore not an “occurrence” under the terms of an insurance policy
• where complaint did not allege a proper \occurrence\ under the policy, insurer had no duty to take further action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).