United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Star Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the broader, non-public solicitation definition of the term “advertising” is the majority view
• stating that the broad definition is the majority rule
• \something more\ than the mere advertising of a product for sale is required to claim coverage under an advertising injury provision
• “Generally speaking, a direct infringer cannot also be liable as an inducer to infringe based on the same act. As several courts have pointed out, the act of encouraging someone to purchase a product is necessarily subsumed by the actual sale of that product.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).