United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that officer questioning about whether there were any weapons in stopped truck was “proper because it concerned officer safety”
• rejecting the defend- ant’s argument that dashcam video of a traffic stop defeated the officer’s testimony that a traffic violation occurred be- cause the video was poor quality and did not clearly depict the events
• rejecting the defend- ant’s argument that dashcam video of a traffic stop defeated the officer’s testimony that a traffic violation occurred be- cause the video was poor quality and did not clearly depict the events
• “[T]he question is whether the officer reasonably believed that he saw a traffic violation, not whether the [plaintiff] actually violated the law.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).