Skip to main content
· 2/8/1911

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Pennsylvania ex rel. Clarion County Poor Dist.

Citations

  • 186 F. 285
  • 108 C.C.A. 331
  • 1911 WL 5085
  • 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “discovery, should precede consideration of dispositive motions when the facts sought to be discovered are relevant to consideration of the particular motion at hand.”
  • “Discovery should precede consideration of dispositive motions when the facts sought to be discovered are relevant to consideration of the particular motion at hand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buffington, Gray, Lanning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.