United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying statute and rules in effect at the time of the petitioner’s crimes in 1985 and 1986; holding that, “as was the case in Haskins, the rules did not provide for discharge by inaction or by operation of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).