United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Gillis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a summary judgment in favor of insureds under a commercial automobile policy where, among other things, the only truck listed as a “covered auto” fell within the definition of “mobile equipment”
• affirming a summary judgment in favor of insureds under a commercial automobile policy where, among other things, the only truck listed as a \covered auto\ fell within the definition of \mobile equipment\
• Contract language that is capable of only one logical interpretation is accorded its literal meaning, but terms that are susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation are “uncertain of meaning or expression and, thus, ambiguous.”
• truck with boom and ladder covered despite exclusion for mobile equipment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).