Skip to main content
· 2/9/1927

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Centropolis Bank of Kansas City, Mo.

Citations

  • 17 F.2d 913
  • 53 A.L.R. 295
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se litigants should be treated with great leniency 18 when evaluating compliance with the technical rules of civil procedure
  • applying Missouri law and holding that an “implied contract” of indemnification arises from a contract of suretyship
  • applying Missouri law and holding that an “implied contract” of indemnification arises from a contract of suretyship
  • applying Missouri law and recognizing a common law duty to indemnify a surety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, Phillips, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.