United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blankenhorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no equal protection violation where restraint technique was not “beyond the scope of professionally acceptable choices”
• “We now hold as a matter of law that plaintiffs in the present case cannot recover general or punitive damages [under § 1983] arising out of defendants’ alleged violations of the IDEA . . . .”; failing even to mention or cite Digre

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).