United States Fidelity & Guarantee v. Coatsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a bankruptcy court does not abuse its discretion in reaching a decision without conducting an evidentiary hearing where the record provided ample evidence
• citing, inter alia, In re Micek, 473 B.R. 185, 188 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2012) (holding that the claimant must establish entitlement to priority by a preponderance of the evidence)
• citing, inter alia, In re Micek, 473 B.R. 185, 188 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2012) (holding that the claimant must establish entitlement to priority by a preponderance of the evidence)
• vacating order and remanding to bankruptcy court for further factual development
• vacating order and remanding to bankruptcy court for further factual development

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).