Skip to main content
· 12/15/1989

United States ex rel. Yates v. Hardiman

Citations

  • 727 F. Supp. 436
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15797
  • 1989 WL 158495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving, in a very like circumstance, the use of a seated jury in such a dual role

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aspen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.