United States Ex Rel. Windsor v. Dyncorp, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no FCA violation where the government and its contractor worked together to solve a problem created when the contract’s rigid billing provisions did not accommodate changed circumstances
• “[T]he Department of Labor has sole responsibility for resolving classification disputes under the Davis–Bacon Act . . . .”
• “[A] Davis-Bacon Act worker classification dis- pute, by itself, is not an FCA claim because such disputes must be resolved by the Department of Labor.”
• “[A] Davis-Bacon Act worker classification dis- pute, by itself, is not an FCA claim because such disputes must be resolved by the Department of Labor.”
• a claim within the meaning of the FCA must have “the purpose and effect of causing the government to pay out money where it is not due” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).