United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “a district court may deny leave if amending the complaint would be futile”
• holding that only “conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged generally”
• holding that because under Texas law, the term “individual” encompasses only human beings and does not include corporations, the exception to the TAA enunciated in section 171.002 was not applicable to an employment agreement between a corporation and an employee
• holding that because under Texas law, the term \individual\ encompasses only human beings and does not include corporations, the exception to the TAA enunciated in section 171.002 was not applicable to an employment agreement between a corporation and an employee
• recognizing a fraudulent inducement claim under the FCA based on obtaining a government contract through false statements
• noting that an amendment is futile if the amended complaint would not survive a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).