United States ex rel. Weyhrauch v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a motion to intervene was untimely when the proposed intervenor had nineteen months of constructive notice
• collecting cases where delays of at least twelve months were found untimely
• “[A]t all times, the burden remains with the moving party to demonstrate that consolidation is appropriate.”
• “Notably, judicial economy would not be served by consolidating two actions at such disparate stages.”
• “Notably, judicial economy would not be served by consolidating two actions at such disparate stages.”
• “While accepting as true the non- conclusory allegations of the motion, courts applying Rule 24 must be mindful that each intervention case is highly fact specific and tends to resist comparison to prior cases.” (citation, alteration, and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).