United States Ex Rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reconsideration under Rule 54(b) may be warranted when a court has “patently misunderstood the parties” or “made an error in failing to consider ... data”
• placing the burden on the movant in the context of a Rule 54(b) motion for reconsideration
• placing the burden on the movant in the context of a Rule 54(b) motion for reconsideration
• “[S]ince the 2009 Rules amendments, the decision whether to allow an amend- ment to add an omitted counterclaim is governed exclusively by Rule 15.”
• \A court may deny a motion for reconsideration when it raises 'arguments for reconsideration the court has already rejected on the merits.' \ (alterations omitted
• “[S]ince the 2009 Rules amendments, the decision whether to allow an amend- ment to add an omitted counterclaim is governed exclusively by Rule 15.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).