United States Ex Rel. Tyson v. Amerigroup Illinois, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under Oakland City, the plaintiffs must show that “(1) the non-discrimination provisions were prerequisites to participation in the [] program under federal law; (2
• declining to conduct economic analysis of defendants’ excessiveness challenge to statutory penalty because excessiveness determination “should turn on the nature of the Defendants’ conduct, not the state of his coffers”
• upholding jury’s determination of the number of claims based on witness testimony even though the forms were not moved into evidence
• declining to conduct economic analysis of defendants’ excessiveness challenge to statutory penalty because excessiveness determination “should turn on the nature of the Defendants’ conduct, not the state of his coffers”
• affirming a jury’s grant of both compensatory damages and civil penalties under the FCA
• “[M]ere knowledge of the submission of claims and knowledge of the falsity of those claims is insufficient to establish liability under the FCA. Instead, . . . some sort of an affirmative action [is required].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).