Skip to main content
· 11/2/1973

United States Ex Rel. Testamark v. Vincent

Citations

  • 367 F. Supp. 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the ALJ did not specify what more aggressive treatment 21 options were appropriate or available, it would be illogical to discredit Plaintiff for failing to pursue 22 non-conservative treatment options where none exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.