United States ex rel. Tarmac Florida, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where active and open union supporter is improperly discharged and where such discharge risks serious adverse impact on employee interest in unionization, order of reinstatement is just and proper
• holding that reinstatement was a proper remedy on the same grounds
• reinstatement of employees upheld because discharges \risked a serious adverse impact on employee interest in unionization\
• \[W]e do not believe the absence of a final unit determination should necessarily preclude an interim bargaining order.\
• reinstatement of employees upheld because discharges “risked a serious adverse impact on employee interest in unionization”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).