Skip to main content
· 3/13/1992

United States ex rel. Small Business Administration v. Stanko

Citations

  • 795 F. Supp. 729
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3336
  • 1992 WL 189269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he denial of modification” where plaintiff “was in default on his mortgage at the time” “is not an adverse action”
  • explaining that where plaintiff alleged that defendant made misleading statements in connection with negotiating a loan modification agreement, she had adequately stated a claim under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e, 1692f
  • dismissing wrongful 7 foreclosure cause of action because “Plaintiffs have pled no facts indicating that the foreclosure 8 sale, which has already occurred, would have been averted but for the alleged deficiencies in the 9 foreclosure process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huyett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.