Skip to main content
· 2/28/1930

United States ex rel. Siemen v. Day

Citations

  • 41 F.2d 853
  • 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court erred in setting child support for child’s education expenses as a “separate, indeterminate amount”
  • trial court erred in ordering education costs separate from child support instead of as rebuttal factor to deviate from presumptive amount under guidelines
  • trial court erred in ordering education costs separate from child support instead of as rebuttal factor to deviate from presumptive amount under guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.