· 3/31/2015
United States Ex Rel. Shemesh v. CA, Inc.
Citations
- 89 F. Supp. 3d 67
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41041
- 2015 WL 1447755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to dismiss unjust enrichment claim despite allegation of express contract because “the government has alleged that its contract with [Defendant] may be invalid because it would not have entered into it but for [Defendant’s] fraudulent conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.