· 5/29/1961
United States ex rel. Saunders v. Richmond
Citations
- 194 F. Supp. 670
- 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing its facts from those in Eaton, where “there was no statutory authority for the par- ticular regulation for the violation of which the defendant was indicted”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timbers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.