Skip to main content
· 8/31/2001

United States Ex Rel. Satalich v. City of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 160 F. Supp. 2d 1092
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13934
  • 2001 WL 1002508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The language of [Section 4 3730(h)] precludes any employer from retaliating against an employee for engaging in lawful 5 actions that further an FCA claim or investigation, irrespective of whether it is the employer that 6 is the target of the FCA investigation.”
  • collecting cases rejecting necessity of qui tam claim
  • applying the controlling precedent of Hughes Aircraft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.