· 11/20/1963
United States ex rel. Priester v. Fay
Citations
- 223 F. Supp. 629
- 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “allowing parties to cure a deficient report with later depositions would further undermine a primary goal of Rule 26(a)(2): to shorten or decrease the need for expert depositions”
- “The written [expert] report should explain ‘how’ and ‘why’ the expert reached the opinions he or she intends to offer at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.