Skip to main content
· 11/20/1963

United States ex rel. Priester v. Fay

Citations

  • 223 F. Supp. 629
  • 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “allowing parties to cure a deficient report with later depositions would further undermine a primary goal of Rule 26(a)(2): to shorten or decrease the need for expert depositions”
  • “The written [expert] report should explain ‘how’ and ‘why’ the expert reached the opinions he or she intends to offer at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.