Skip to main content
· 1/16/2015

United States Ex Rel. Osheroff v. Humana, Inc.

Citations

  • 776 F.3d 805
  • 2015 WL 223705
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district court properly considered judicially noticed documents for purposes of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion
  • “Courts may take judicial notice of publicly filed documents, such as those in state court litigation, at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Pryor, Fay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.