United States ex rel. Noll v. Fay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a defect in service and concluding that “[p]laintiff's motion for default judgment is denied as to [certain defendants] and” vacating the clerk’s entry of default
• denying entry of default judgment where plaintiff failed to offer any direct or circumstantial evidence demonstrating that an “Associate Administrator” was a person capable of accepting service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B)
• denying entry of default judgment where plaintiff failed to offer any direct or circumstantial evidence demonstrating that an “Associate Administrator” was a person capable of accepting service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B)
• denying entry of default judgment where plaintiff failed to offer any direct or circumstantial evidence demonstrating that an “Associate Administrator” was a person capable of accepting service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1)(B)
• considering three requisite factors for vacating a Clerk’s entry of default
• plaintiff has burden to prove existence of “agency relationship” between 24 defendant and individual who purportedly accepted service as defendant’s 25 authorized appointed agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).