United States ex rel. Neumann v. Page

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the court lacked sufficient facts at motion to dismiss stage to determine whether individual was employee or independent contractor and allowing parties to refile motion on this ground at summary judgment
• declining to convert the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment despite both parties’ submission of various materials extraneous to the pleadings
• inappropriate to convert motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment where “little or no discovery has occurred”
• “A court should not convert a motion[] . . . when little or no discovery has occurred.”
• “Given the fact-intensive nature of the analysis and the number and range of factors to consider, this Court concludes that it is inappropriate to grant a motion to dismiss at this early stage.”
• “Given the fact-intensive nature of the analysis and the number 15 and range of factors to consider, this Court concludes that it is inappropriate to grant a motion to 16 dismiss at this early stage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).