United States Ex Rel. MPA Construction, Inc. v. XL Specialty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a per se right for principals “appears to conflict with Rule 24(a)(2)” because the surety is required to provide a good faith defense for the principal
• granting prime contractors 24(b) motion to intervene in Miller Act suit by subcontractor against surety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).