Skip to main content
· 10/30/2002

United States Ex Rel. Mossey v. PaL-Tech, Inc.

Citations

  • 231 F. Supp. 2d 94
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21129
  • 2002 WL 31455105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[EJxpert testimony consisting of legal conclusions will not be permitted because such testimony merely states what result should be reached, thereby improperly influencing the decisions of the trier of fact and impinging upon the responsibilities of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.