United States ex rel. Morrison v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “information from the two-years 6 and three-months prior to the April 2002 liability period may be relevant to demonstrate 7 the pattern and practice of discriminatory conduct alleged by Plaintiffs”
• request for “all documents” for persons employed in 18 “Sales Organization” was not overly broad where party had narrowly defined “Sales 19 Organization”
• “[W]hen the request is overly broad on its face or when relevancy is not readily apparent, the party seeking the discovery has the burden to show the relevancy of the request.”
• “When . . . the omnibus phrase modifies a sufficiently specific type of information, document, or event, rather than large or general categories of information or documents, the request will not be deemed objectionable on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).