Skip to main content
· 12/7/1931

United States Ex Rel. Meyer v. Day

Citations

  • 54 F.2d 336
  • 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no substance in the appellant’s contention that there is a distinction in respect to moral turpitude between the commission of the substantive crime of grand larceny and an attempt to commit it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mahtoh, Hahd, Swah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.