Skip to main content
· 4/19/1928

United States ex rel. Mayer v. Glass

Citations

  • 25 F.2d 941
  • 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Brady is not violated by a delay in disclosing evidence so long as the evidence is disclosed during trial
  • noting that Brady is not violated by a delay in disclosing evidence so long as the evidence is disclosed during trial
  • declining to consider a “cursory and summary assertion” that made “no specific assignment of error”
  • upholding willful blindness instruction where the defendants, who were charged with laundering drug money, failed to inquire about the source of the money and used incorrect names and addresses on documents when wiring money
  • identifiability of the declarant is helpful, but not required, especially where the statement itself and the surrounding circumstances provide sufficient evidence of reliability
  • failure to assign error in a brief is considered abandonment of the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buffington, Woolley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.