· 4/19/1928
United States ex rel. Mayer v. Glass
Citations
- 25 F.2d 941
- 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Brady is not violated by a delay in disclosing evidence so long as the evidence is disclosed during trial
- noting that Brady is not violated by a delay in disclosing evidence so long as the evidence is disclosed during trial
- declining to consider a “cursory and summary assertion” that made “no specific assignment of error”
- upholding willful blindness instruction where the defendants, who were charged with laundering drug money, failed to inquire about the source of the money and used incorrect names and addresses on documents when wiring money
- identifiability of the declarant is helpful, but not required, especially where the statement itself and the surrounding circumstances provide sufficient evidence of reliability
- failure to assign error in a brief is considered abandonment of the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buffington, Woolley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.